Dmitry Dorodnov Dedicated to Dr. Ute Ziegenhain.
Psychoanalysis, Theory of Attachment, Theory of Experience (the outline).
Theoretical considerations.
When we are speaking about experience, we remembering some facts, some emotions, some feelings about ourselves and others. This, what we called experience. This, what we called experience in common language.
‘Theory of experience’ is the attempt to understand and to conceptualize the experience in more theoretical and scientific way.
So, the first research question of this paper is,
(1) What is the experience from the scientific point of view?
Second question is,
(2) Is there any theoretical basis for to establish the Theory of experience, as a theory?
Third question is,
(3) If there is the theoretical basis for the Theory of experience, what kind of theory is the Theory of experience? Is it philosophical, psychological or multidisciplinary theory?
This is the three major questions for this paper.
Some points.
CRITIC of the modern ‘understanding’ of the experience.
Summation of the email exchange with Dr. Alan Gibault.
My gmail.com dairy: German and English version of it.
Equalizing of the present.
Re-understanding of Experience.
How to save, disclose and to use the Experience.
Theory of Experience in psychopathology.
Danger of working with the experience in psychopathology.
The Individuality and the Experience.
Critic of the modern understanding of the individuality.
Wrong understanding of individuality.
To be the same as others, or to be independent.
Religious feelings and the Theory of Experience.
How to feel the religious feelings?
White desk, phenomenon of imprinting and the Theory of Experience.
Is there any imprinting phenomenon in adult life?
Mother-child relationships and the Theory of Experience.
Psychoanalysis and the Theory of experience.
From ‘my scientific point of view’ the most powerful thing in psychoanalysis is its ‘instrumental’ basis. The conception of Setting, the conception of Free associations and the conception of Interpretations. This three conceptions, as well as some others, are hardly to be changed in last 80-100 years. This is a good sign. The sign of recognition. Mainly from its psychotherapeutic source one can draw the possibility to work and to ‘work through’ one’s experience in the Theory of experience. The power of this (named above) mainly practical conceptions is ‘good enough’ to bring it into the ‘practical’ side of the Theory of experience.
Theory of attachment and the Theory of experience.
Mainly because its name the ‘theory of attachment’ I named ‘my’ theory the Theory of experience. Attachment theory is the theory, because of its ‘practical power’. As we al know the theory is verify itself on practice, mainly on practice.
In ‘my’ theory the experience is about how to take, to elaborate and to use the information provided by one’s life (during a life span).
The Theory of experience is the theory about how to built the ‘bridge’ between the ‘theory’ and the practical side (the practical side of experience). To built the theoretical basis for practical side of experience.
Clinical application of the Theory of experience.
Normal and/or neurotic patients are speaking about there experience in more or less clear way (recognizable way). Psychotic group (especially schizophrenic patients) are speaking in not recognizable manner (the real experience is existing or not). For the psychotic group the question about ‘is it true or not’ is not the main question. So, to work with experience in psychotic sample is the most hard task.
Dmitry Dorodnov, clinical psychologist
27.06.2007
This paper is written in time of my staying in Berlin (Germany) as a year scholar of the DAAD (German academic exchange service) (2006-2007) and dedicated to my scientific adviser Dr. Ute Ziegenhain (Ulm, Germany).
![[info]](http://l-stat.livejournal.com/img/userinfo.gif){kind=small}
dmitry_dorodnov's journal
